A Ted Kusio Case Study

Taking It to the Screens

Rallying Online

Designing a Virtual Protest Experience—From Scratch, in Ten Days—for Stand Up for Science

Stand Up for Science (SUFS) is a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization defending federal science, public health, and democratic institutions. I joined as Creative Director on a three-month contract in February 2025, stepping into a role with a big mission and very little runway.

My first major project was the second annual National Day of Action on March 7th—a simultaneous rally across 50+ cities with a flagship event in Washington, D.C. I came on two weeks before the event and led creative through event day: a multi-series social campaign, a Social Media Kit and other assets for local organizers, stage banners, and a same-night flyer printed morning-of. About 2,000 people showed up in D.C. Speakers included Rep. Jamie Raskin, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, and NIH whistleblower Jenna Norton. #StandUpForScience trended on Bluesky throughout the day.

That event showed SUFS could get people to take it to the streets for a traditional protest. Could we get them to take it to their screens for three virtual, accessible rallies?

My Role

Across all three virtual rallies, I was responsible for:

THE CHALLENGE

Ten Days. No Budget. No Map.

SUFS had never hosted a virtual rally. There was no template for what we envisioned. And we had just ten days to pull it off.

When leadership decided to host the first virtual rally, to coincide with Indivisible's No Kings 3 event, the creative challenge was enormous and undefined. More than a webinar or a Zoom town hall, it had to feel like a protest—with energy, presence, and political weight, while being accessible to everyone. The design had to carry that.

What We Were Up Against

  • No advertising budget—everything had to work organically across Instagram, Bluesky, Threads, TikTok, emails, and our website
  • No existing template—no prior virtual rally creative to build from
  • An unfamiliar format—we had to explain what a virtual rally even was to potential speakers and attendees
  • A ten-day window—from green light to live event

Really Requiring Accessibility

  • As a team, we decided the event had to be fully accessible: live ASL interpretation and captioning, real-time Spanish translation
  • That commitment had to be front and center in all promotion—it was a core part of the pitch to potential attendees who were excluded from, or couldn't attend, in-person events
  • Cross-team coordination was essential—social posts had to have live links to registration pages, and logistics details had to be locked before anything could go out

On top of the creative work, I was coordinating across teams simultaneously booking speakers, configuring Zoom, building the registration flow, and standing up a web presence. Social posts had to be informative and timely—which meant I needed to know when every piece was ready before I could publish anything.

THE SOLUTION

Building the Visual Language of a Virtual Protest

The Name Did Some of the Work

The first problem was clarity: people needed to immediately understand what this event was, who was behind it, and that it was accessible. So we named it exactly that: The First Official No Kings 3 Virtual and Accessible Rally, Organized by Stand Up for Science.

That's a lot of words—intentionally. I designed a type treatment that fit everything in without losing hierarchy. The key information was emphasized; the supporting details filled in around it. It was the first piece of communication design for the event.

The Key Visual: Protest on a Screen

For the hero graphic, I needed something that communicated "protest," "virtual," "science," and some of the very American issues we were fighting for. It also had to feel urgent and unpolished—not like a corporate livestream.

The concept: classic protest elements—raised fists, rally signs, a megaphone—bursting out of a laptop screen, combined with American symbols like the Statue of Liberty (who is also basically raising her fist) and an American flag. I added science elements and protesters who reflect who actually shows up to a virtual rally: someone in a wheelchair, someone in a mask. Everything was layered in a grunge, imperfect, DIY protest aesthetic. The result feels familiar to anyone who's been to a protest, but makes clear this one was different, and happening digitally.

Templates That Could Keep Up

With ten days and a lot of moving parts, I built templates wherever I could:

I mapped out ten days of steady content promoting the event broadly, focusing on specific topics and issues, and explaining what "accessible" actually meant. Every post had to have live links—which meant coordinating with other teams to know exactly when each piece was ready to go out.

A System That Scaled

Once No Kings 3 was behind us, SUFS hosted two more virtual rallies—Earth Day on April 22 and May Day on May 1—and I carried the visual system forward into both.

Earth Day Virtual Rally

This event was a partnership with the Earth Day organization, so I developed a logo lockup to reflect the co-branding—a model I'd established with the No Kings treatment.

The laptop concept returned, this time in green with environmental elements: an earth, trees, environmental portest signs, and an eagle and buffalo as American symbols. The background is a soft, organic, earthy green burst. The event also moved to a new platform (BigMarker), which opened up additional real estate—platform-native graphics, waiting room screens, and promotional placements I hadn't had on Zoom.

May Day Virtual Rally

May Day brought another partnership and another lockup. For the main image, I shifted the protest imagery to center people of science: raised fists holding books, a calculator, a stethoscope. I went with a blue laptop (red might have felt more on-theme for May Day, but risked reading as political rather than scientific). The imagery was busier, but the message was still clear, with a background based on staunch democratic socialist Albert Einstein's notes. The text treatment shifted to lead with the event name, with "Virtual and Accessible" as a secondary detail.

By this point the system was genuinely reusable—each event felt distinct yet recognizably part of the same campaign.

Earth Day also came together on a tight timeline, and I formalized a pre-launch readiness process: before any go-live decision was made, I ran a go/no-go check with each team—communications, production, logistics—and helped any team that was "no go" work through what they needed to get there. It kept us from launching into preventable chaos.

RESULTS

No Kings 3: By the Numbers

Big-name speakers and over 8,400 attendees, including a community that finally felt seen.

The Numbers

  • 11,400 registrants
  • 8,400+ attendees
  • 90 minutes average watch time
  • $25,000+ raised
  • 64,250 site visits—10× the baseline
  • 32 press mentions, including 9 international

Notable Speakers

  • Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14)
  • House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries
  • Skye Perryman, CEO, Democracy Forward
  • Syanne Bloom, Disability Justice Advocate

Beyond the Numbers

Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi not only delivered remarks—joining from the Amtrak Metroliner alongside Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—but afterward asked the backstage team if she could stay on as a viewer, and watched the rest of the rally in full.

The response from the disability and accessibility community was unlike anything I'd seen from an event campaign. People who had been physically unable to attend in-person rallies—because of chronic illness, disability, immunocompromise, or caregiving responsibilities—found their way in. And they were vocal about it.

"I was on the virtual protest. I am disabled and bedridden and desperately wanted to go. This at least let my anger be counted and feel connected to others. For some of us, it is physically impossible to make our voices heard."

"Such an amazing platform for those who couldn't attend in person. Greatly appreciated the ASL interpreters along with the participants describing themselves. You've sparked a hope in me that I'll be forever grateful for!"

"Thank you SO much for doing this! As a single mom to autistic kids, I don't feel like I can go to in-person events. This was so great to be a part of something and to feel hope, in a way that I can fit into my day."

"I was bummed that I lacked access to the in-person protests because masks are not required and I'm immunocompromised—but that was 👏❤️💯✊ representation and intersectionality is fucking beautiful to see and SOOOOO needed."

"If you're disabled, you know they never listen to us. So this is a big deal."

The Earth Day (April 22) and May Day (May 1) rallies drew smaller audiences—as did their real-life counterparts—but the template and process we built meant each consecutive event shipped more smoothly.

RETROSPECTIVE

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Build the System, Not Just the Asset

While I'm proud of the specific designs for each event, the most valuable thing I did was build a visual system that could carry forward event to event. The laptop visual base, the protest-energy aesthetic, the grunge overlay, the social and image asset template library: all of it meant Earth Day and May Day didn't have to start from zero. Each one felt new without requiring a full rebuild.

Accessibility Is a Design Decision

Making the event fully accessible—ASL, Spanish translation, live captioning—wasn't lip service or a checkbox. It clearly signaled the event was truly for everyone. The response from attendees made that concrete: so many people felt like they were participating in the democratic process, in a format they could actually access. Designing with that in mind, and promoting it clearly, is what made the difference.

Process Is Creative Work Too

The go/no-go readiness check I introduced for Earth Day isn't new or glamorous, but it made us launch on time. When you're coordinating creative across communications, production, and logistics teams under a tight timeline, asking "Are you ready to go, or what do you need to get there?" gets clear, concrete answers everyone can act on. Making that a structured check—every team, every time—kept us from going live into preventable problems.

What I'd Do Differently

Contact me